Q: did the use of electronic voting result in the disenfranchising some of the voters, given that only 78.43% actually voted, thus resulting in Rev. Pres. Harrison's election representing not 66.26% of the Synod, but in actuality only 51.98% (66.26% of the 78.43% voting)?

Might the percentage voting had been higher if the "traditional" paper ballot or an electronic real-time voting system had been used at convention?

Further, why the rush to elect in advance of the actual convention? Is not one of the duties and privileges of delegates to take such action in person at the convention?