I take issue with the comment from the article..."It is still murder even if the purpose of killing the baby is to harvest his spinal cord to develop medical therapies."

I might be wrong, but I am sure the researchers decided to use an already aborted fetus. The way this is written...Rev Daniel Hinton is implying that the researchers went out and had someone abort their baby for the sole purpose of research. I doubt that was the way it happened. "We need to do some research so....let's go kill an unborn baby."