In reply to Harold.

Thanks , Harold.

For some to say this is an "activist" court, I'd like to ask "What was the decision in Ciizens United? It carved out a piece of our Constitution, stated that "corporations are people" and expanded laws for political donations.
That was by a conservative court; isn't that conservative activism?" Anybody who says it wasn't is fooling themselves. Activism is in the eye of the beholder;
if you're against it, be against it whether it's Democratic or Republican. I don't like it from EITHER side.

This decision is the current courts interpretation of the establishment clause.
Like it or not, the courts have become political. And that means justice, in the end, will be the real sacrifice.