(Rated: 14A [Canada] and R [MPAA] for strong, disturbing war violence and language throughout, including some sexual references; directed by Clint Eastwood; stars Bradley Cooper, Sienna Miller, Ben Reed, Luke Grimes; run time: 132 minutes.)
‘There are three types of people in this world: sheep, wolves and sheepdogs’
By Ted Giese
In Clint Eastwood’s film “American Sniper,” the central character, Chris Kyle (Bradley Cooper), is a Texan who grew up wanting to live the life of a “cowboy” — content to chase the rodeo circuit on weekends, drink Lone Star beer with his brother, and spend time with his girlfriend.
That changed when world events like the 1998 attacks on U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya ignited his “sheepdog” instincts, prompting him to enlist and train as a Navy SEAL. Following Kyle’s enlistment and marriage to his new girlfriend, Taya (Sienna Miller), the remainder of the film covers his four tours in the Iraq War and his struggle to work out a balance between his family life and his military career.
Early in the biopic, in a flashback to a family meal following an incident of bullying and brotherly retribution at school, Kyle’s father (Ben Reed) tells his young sons a parable about sheep, wolves and sheepdogs. “There are three types of people in this world,” he says: “sheep, wolves and sheepdogs. Some people prefer to believe that evil doesn’t exist in the world, and if it ever darkened their doorstep, they wouldn’t know how to protect themselves. Those are the sheep.”
He continues: “Then you’ve got predators who use violence to prey on the weak. They’re the wolves. And then there are those blessed with the gift of aggression — an overpowering need to protect the flock. These men are the rare breed who live to confront the wolf. They are the sheepdogs.” This secular parable of the sheep, wolves and sheepdogs undergirds Kyle’s thoughts, words and deeds throughout Eastwood’s film and define Kyle as a man.
Conflicting vocations
Kyle was a good marksman growing up, a skill that landed him a military posting as a Navy SEAL sniper protecting Marines. His prowess as a sniper gained him nicknames like “The Legend” from his friends and the “Devil of Ramadi” from his enemies. He accumulated 160 confirmed sniper kills between 2003 and 2009.
In the house-to-house hunt for the Al Qaeda leader Al-Zarqawi and his operatives, snipers played an integral part by protecting convoys and soldiers. Eastwood places Kyle in the thick of the Iraq War’s unfolding story, hot on the trail of Zarqawi and his number-two man, a “wolf” who horrifically tortured and killed his adversaries with a power drill.
While most of the plot takes place in Iraq, Eastwood also provides viewers a window into the difficult stateside home life of the Kyle family between Chris’ tours of duty as he struggles to adapt to civilian life. Much of the film’s drama comes from Kyle’s conflicting vocations.
On the one hand, he’s called to be a husband to his wife, Taya, and support their family; on the other hand, he is called to protect his fellow soldiers fighting in Iraq and ultimately protect America and his family.
While in Iraq he thinks about his family, and while in the United States he thinks about the people he isn’t helping in the war. This sentiment is encapsulated in a statement Chris makes to a Navy physician while being assessed for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Navy doctor: “Do you ever think that … you might have seen things or … done some things over there that you wish you hadn’t?”
Kyle: “Oh, that’s not me. No.”
Navy doctor: “What’s not you?”
Kyle: “I was just protecting my guys; they were trying to kill … our soldiers and I … I’m willing to meet my Creator and answer for every shot that I took. … The thing that … haunts me are all the guys that I couldn’t save.”
Kyle’s Christianity
Eastwood portrays Kyle as a sincere, if not deeply pious, Christian. In a scene similar to one in the recent Angelina Jolie film “Unbroken” (2014), Kyle attends church as a young boy, and Eastwood makes a point of showing how Kyle carries a Bible with him into combat — a Bible stolen out of the church pew as a kid.
Kyle also voices his priorities in life in descending order: God, country and family. Not everyone orders his or her priorities similarly; secular Americans will knock God right off the list. While it is good to find these Christian elements in the film, there is no real mention of Jesus. However, there is one moment when a fellow soldier, Marc Lee (Luke Grimes), asks Kyle about the Bible he carries into combat, and it feels like Kyle might tell him about Jesus.
In the early scene at church when Kyle steals the Bible, the preacher talks about St. Paul’s conversion and about sight. The scene goes by quickly, but pay attention because the most important asset a sniper has is his ability to see. “American Sniper” addresses Kyle’s ability to see sharply on the battlefield, to see rightly when he pulls the trigger against those who would do harm, and finally, to see clearly in a vocational way regarding his responsibilities to his wife and family. He begins to see this last thing plainly when a sandstorm descends upon him and his fellow soldiers and the sand temporarily blinds him.
An apolitical film
Is “American Sniper” propaganda?
For the most part the film is apolitical. It spends practically no time going into the details of American politics surrounding the Iraq War. There are no memorable images of President George W. Bush or any other notable American government officials and, apart from the brief news reports of the 1998 embassies attacks and 9/11 shown from the vantage point of a person watching them on TV, there is no use of news footage from sources like Fox News, CNN or MSNBC.
Since Eastwood doesn’t spend time providing a nuanced and textured portrait of the Iraqi people, the film may feel unbalanced in favor of America for some viewers. Frankly, the balance Eastwood seemed to be striving to portray was the balance within one man’s heart and not between two peoples at war.
Is the film patriotic? It certainly doesn’t have the crass false patriotism of a blaring President’s Day car-dealership commercial. It’s respectful of the pain, suffering and sacrifices military families go through, and where it waves the flag, it is for the memory of a soldier who, even though he was a “legend” in military circles, might end up lost in the shuffle of history.
Because the film’s primary focus is on one man, and because that one man, while not piously devout, is still recognizable as a white, heterosexual Christian, there will be critics who say Kyle doesn’t represent a comprehensive picture of who America is — and they would be right. However, to be fair, it did not appear that Eastwood’s goal in making the film was to present a comprehensive picture of who America is. Chris Kyle’s personal story is in the driver’s seat of this film; America is riding shotgun.
Eastwood provides quality direction, and his pacing is particularly good. Bradley Cooper’s Oscar-nominated performance is even stronger. In fact, Cooper’s performance is much more nuanced and likable than his work in “American Hustle” (2013) or “Silver Linings Playbook” (2012).
“American Sniper” includes some very difficult and uncomfortable moments to watch both on and off the battlefield, and is not a movie for everyone. That being said, it is doing exceedingly well at the box office and may be benefiting from the recent release of three WWII films: “Fury” (2014), “Unbroken” (2014) and “The Imitation Game” (2014).
Coming at just the right time, and telling a story from a controversial war still in the minds of the American public, “American Sniper” tackles the part of the story Angelina Jolie sidestepped in “Unbroken” — a soldier’s life away from the war.
“American Sniper” isn’t the definitive film on the subject of conflicting vocations and PTSD, but it does delve more deeply and more carefully into the subject than other recent films, and it works best when looked at as a character study. The film is not a documentary; there will be parts that won’t hold up under scrutiny.
Likewise, it’ll be good to consider that both Jolie in “Unbroken” and Eastwood in “American Sniper” significantly pared down the religious biographical material associated with their central characters, presenting a more generic form of Christianity.
Eastwood’s film is essentially the story of a “sheepdog” who begins the film as a “legend” in his own mind and ends the film as a decorated war hero who truly became “the legend” to the soldiers he kept safe and to the family he learned to love and honor.
The Rev. Ted Giese is associate pastor of Mount Olive Lutheran Church, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada; a contributor to “Reformation Rush Hour” on KFUO-AM Radio, The Canadian Lutheran and Reporter; and movie reviewer for the “Issues, Etc.” radio program. Follow Giese on Twitter: @RevTedGiese.
Posted Jan. 29, 2015
Print page
Great review! Thank you.
I just saw the movie. Excellent, insightful review.
I have not seen the movie and probably won’t because I am simply tired of politics. Many of the members of my parish have gone to see this movie and loved it and were deeply moved. I don’t do movie reviews in my sermons or in the church newsletter. Why are we as the Synod doing them. Some of the comments in the review are biting criticism. It is fine for your own blog but not as the public voice of the Synod.
This is not a political film at all. It is aobut the Chris Kyle’s life as a soldier, an American hero and about how his life as a soldier related to his home life as a husband and father. He was a true patriot for our country. I understand being tired of politics, yet if you actually go see this movie you will see that it steers clear of that. How some people who have interpreted it’s message (many without seeing it) is what has made it “political”. As far as movie reviews, I prefer to have a Christian review of secular entertainment rather that a secular review of secular entertainment. Next on the list for us to see is Unbroken….not on the list: Fifty Shades of Gray! Please reconsider your opinion of this movie and re-evaluate it after you have seen it.
Here is a thoughtful article about the movie, I will quote a short excerpt, but it is worth reading in its entirety:
http://www.salon.com/2015/02/04/this_american_sniper_didnt_keep_track_of_his_kills_and_hates_that_i_ask_him/
The writer interviews another sniper, who has taken a different path than Chris Kyle. Garett Reppenhagen says:
“’I was taken aside more than once at the VA [during group therapy] and told that the VA is not a platform to express my political views. My recovery hinged on the fact that I felt guilt and shame over committing atrocities against an occupied country. We went over there and brutalized and oppressed, and that is part of my psychological and moral injuries. If I can’t talk about it at the VA, then the VA can’t help me.’
Garett’s views are “political,” but the worldview of Chris Kyle as brought to life in “American Sniper” is not. It may be true that it is good for box office for the creators of “American Sniper” to pretend that their movie is not a political one, but if Cooper and Eastwood actually believe that, any narrative not draped in yellow ribbons and billowing red, white and blue flags cannot penetrate the cloak of white imperial privilege they have pulled over their heads.”
“and I … I’m willing to meet my Creator and answer for every shot that I took. … ”
And presumably he has done so; and according to our faith there is forgiveness even for a person who, by his own account, killed 160 fellow men who were guilty (at worst) of patriotically attempting to defend their country from foreign invaders and occupiers, or otherwise were simply trying to live in their own city and had the misfortune to come within Kyle’s crosshairs.
But for a Christian reviewer, and a Pastor, to characterize this movie about a war criminal as being primarily about “conflicting vocations” is to accept the film’s flawed premise with a breathtaking lack of candor.
The Iraq invasion was a war crime. There is no rational counter-argument to this claim that I have heard in 13 years of debating it. It was, and remains, utterly indefensible on classical just war theory, which has been the majority position on these issues within the Lutheran tradition.
To ignore this in a review seems very wrong to me.
I disagree with you, Mr. Miller. Following the laws of our land is right unless asked to deny God/Jesus or to sin. He was defending our country, even if indirectly and obeying government authority. I imagine you would have a problem with, “peace through strength” even though the opposite would mean invasion with an horrendous cost of lives. It isn’t always ok to sit back idly while innocent people are killed also. Sometimes paying an immediate price saves countless lives in the future.
” I imagine you would have a problem with, “peace through strength” even though the opposite would mean invasion with an horrendous cost of lives.”
“Peace through strength”, interpreted by you to condone the Iraq war, is precisely the cause of an invasion with an horrendous cost of lives. About a million innocent Iraqis lost their lives through our invasion. (Second Johns Hopkins / Lancet survey). Iraq had not attacked, and had no capability to attack the United States.
It isn’t always ok to sit back idly while innocent people are killed also, which is why I was involved in protesting the Iraq War from before the time it began.
It is perplexing that you disagree with me while making my argument.
I don’t consider the invasion of Iraq a war crime. War crimes may have been committed but not by an invasion. Taking of a combatant life in a war is not murder.
Unfortunately, ever since Viet Nam, women and children are sometimes used to take and or threaten our soldier’s lives. There is no choice but to defend ourselves. The “sniper” role is hard for some to accept as just, let alone necessary . But then many of the same people who struggle with that role cannot accept war in any sense. Mankind’s sin has made for many sad and horrible events in this world. War is one of them. But not assisting or defending our fellow man is in my mind, more disgraceful than some of war’s consequences.
Excellent film which far left liberal and politically correct folks will not like. This is a good and accurate review.
I appreciate all of the reviews. If they help parents determine which movies the kids go to – great. If they help others recognize false doctrine -great. There will be differing opinions for various movies. Perhaps we need two reviewers to see if there are two thumbs up. Whatever you do, please continue reviewing movies. I have used the reviews to discuss numerous films and they give me good talking points.
I have three Honorable Discharges, including a 15 month stint as a corpsman with the 8th Marine infantry regiment in the 2nd Marine Division. It is always, the “chicken hawks.” who never spent one day in a rifle company who are the biggest warmongers. Like most vets, I don’t judge the service of any other vet, especially those who fought in wars where the U.S. is the uninvited invader and occupier of another nation. The leaders of invading nations always justify the invasion to their own citizens as Hitler, Bush and Putin have done, and as every preceding leader. With that said, when I read the New Testament, it appears Jesus acted in anger only once against the moneychangers in the Temple. There is no scriptural indication that Jesus would have ever advocated for a Roman archer or an American sniper as a Christian role model.
It’s hard to enjoy the film knowing Chris Kyle’s claims of executing 30 suspected looters after Hurricane Katrina, his desire to shoot anyone carrying a Koran, etc. Is this man really a hero, a Christian to be emulated? No.